June 4th: Memory and Ethics
Abstract
In this essay I look first at some general problems of memory and of how events are retold from memory. Then I focus on memory of June Fourth and divide the question by asking how three categories of people—perpetrators, victims, and bystanders—have remembered, failed to remember, or tried to alter memory. The tripartite division of “perpetrators, victims, and bystanders” is not perfect but I find it illuminating. Nearly all the questions that come up have moral implications, so I call the essay “memory and ethics”. I draw upon examples from literature, memoir, journalism, film, and personal acquaintance.
References
Bibliographical reference
Perry Link, “June 4th: Memory and Ethics”, China Perspectives, 2009/2 | 2009, 4-16.
Electronic reference
Perry Link, “June 4th: Memory and Ethics”, China Perspectives [Online], 2009/2 | 2009, Online since 01 June 2011, connection on 29 March 2024. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/4797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.4797
Top of pageCopyright
The text and other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.
Top of page