François Godement, Que veut la Chine ? De Mao au capitalisme (What does China want? From Mao to capitalism)
1Far from being yet another panoramic account of China’s economic and diplomatic breakthroughs, this latest work by François Godement takes readers (whether well-versed in contemporary China or not) through the arcana of Communist Party politics a few months after one of the worst political scandals in the history of the People’s Republic and at a time when it is witnessing a top-level changing of guard that will guide it through the decade to come.
2Chapter 1 briefly reviews the case of Bo Xilai, the former Party Secretary for Chongqing Municipality (pp. 17-34). Bo sought to turn the autonomous city into a political, economic, and social laboratory for China by promoting the Great Helmsman’s thoughts (especially by encouraging “Red Songs” in the city’s public spaces). He wanted to use his successful crackdown on crime as a launch-pad to the highest rungs of power. His downfall constituted the first real shakeup at the top since the 1989 Tiananmen events.
3A good deal of the country’s political life that the top leaders had tried to keep from their compatriots’ gaze was revealed through this affair; Bo Xilai indirectly exposed the actual and potential leaders to the wrath of a population exasperated with the impunity enjoyed by the high and mighty, whose interests were too closely linked to those of economic actors (Chapter 2).
4The real or imagined wealth amassed by leaders while in office began to exercise the minds of millions of disadvantaged Chinese, and the elites faced the immense challenge of reducing inequalities while safeguarding their privileges and prerogatives (Chapter 3). The question has arisen whether the one-party model can survive the social changes sweeping the country (Chapter 4).
5At Hu Jintao’s behest, the Party-state has reasserted control over the judiciary: now the Supreme People’s Court oversees and confirms the death penalty (Chapter 4). The Court has suspended several sentences, commuting the death penalty to life in prison (while reserving the right to overturn its verdict at any point in time). The role of the police and the army has been strengthened in the repression apparatus, as evident in numerous preventive campaigns and crackdowns on information circulating via the Internet. The judiciary functions but the concept of justice has made no progress: the legislative arsenal has grown over the past ten years, but as Godement points out, China is still saddled with “rule by law rather than rule of law” (Chapter 6).
6Debate is raging as never before between the conservatives, who favour status quo with regard to reforms ushered in since the 1980s, and the reformers, who deem it necessary to introduce new reforms, both economic and political. While it is conservatives of a reformist bent who prevailed in the elevation of Xi Jinping (son of Xi Zhongxun, a revolutionary hero who was expelled and then victimised during the Cultural Revolution) to Party chief, the new leadership has already recognised that the country has to balance the fruits of growth in order to achieve a better redistribution. This would also entail a fight against the plague of corruption: expulsion of farmers from their land (by corrupt developers), the growing wealth chasm between rural and urban residents, and property becoming inaccessible to the middle class. All this adds greatly to Chinese society’s current uneasiness.
7China is thus at a crossroads, with the paternalistic and authoritarian regime gradually losing steam, and with its socialist ideology proving insufficient to satisfy people’s aspirations for a good life (pp. 57-70). The authorities are obliged to flex their might, which has consequences for the population as a whole: popular indignation is growing by the day, “mass incidents” (qunti kangbao shijian群体抗暴事件) – an official term meaning protests – are increasing in number and becoming more violent (Chapter 7).
8From a geopolitical and strategic perspective, signs of change were noticeable from 2009 in Chinese diplomacy (Chapter 8). There is a persisting feeling of unease fuelled by the premise of a likely American decline on the one hand and Chinese leaders’ attitudes on the other: in the Chinese authorities’ assessment, the 2008 financial crisis definitively weakened the Western powers, including the United States. China is therefore taking advantage of this opportunity to promote its model of emergence (the Beijing consensus). Paradoxically, however, the most demanding policies adopted since then have only led to the return of the US to the regional landscape (US pivot in Asia), tending to strengthen existing alliances between the United States and its traditional allies (South Korea and Japan), or to create new ones with former “ideological enemies” (as has become evident in recent months with Vietnam) or even former “rogue states.” In this context, the Burma example is instructive: Chinese muscle-flexing in military and economic matters in Burma’s environs led the United States to extend a hand to the former military regime as it embarked on unconditional transformation (and which facilitated an unprecedented democratic opening).
9While it may be that real progress has been made since the start of economic reforms, it is nevertheless the case that the basic principles of new Chinese policies (territorial integrity, national sovereignty, and defence of national interests) resolutely form part of a more coercive line in the last few years, the contours of which remain imprecise to say the least (Chapter 11). In order not to upset the international balance of power, Beijing needs to moderate its discourse and appear more transparent about its real intentions. This will most certainly require adoption of a set of socio-economic reforms (at the international level but primarily at the domestic level), without which the “backlash” on the international front would have grave consequences (Chapter 10).
- 1 Edward N. Luttwak, The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy,Cambridge (MA), Harvard University (...)
10The book also broadens the debate and corroborates the viewpoint of another historian and strategic expert, Edward N. Luttwak:1 “great state autism,” the persistence of history, and people’s general resentment over uncertainties about the future are elements that could eventually further threaten the fragile socio-economic equilibrium. How is it possible to comprehend on the one hand China’s hardening on the international front (alongside its success over the past 30 years) highlighted by the proliferation of tensions and territorial demands along its borders (South China Sea, the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands...), and on the other hand its trend toward economic opening? In the final analysis, the issue linking the two works would be whether China can overcome its contradictions and craft its own strategy within a reasonable timeframe.
11Godement’s book comes across as an excellent account of twenty-first century China’s strengths and weaknesses: it is a country no one can ignore, and a synthesis of the latest political and economic trends is clearly set out in a way that addresses the general reader as well as academics and other experts on contemporary China.
12The author stresses that China no longer enjoys as much elbow room in its bid for modernisation and international recognition as is assumed. While there is hardly any doubt that China will emerge as the world’s leading economy by 2020, there is need to observe what new development imperatives will be favoured by the new leadership (p. 69-70), as there is little doubt that the international context will demand a modicum of transparency (economic and diplomatic) on the part of Chinese leaders. Rapidly rising social inequalities, the expanding scale of discontent (mostly among the younger generation), and growing difficulties with various economic partners on the international front compel China to overcome this challenging new stage (perhaps decisively):
13That is to say, there are no easy answers to the question of whether China will adopt a global international vision based on universal norms and cooperation, or adopt one based on multipolar competition in a world that would have moved beyond post-1945 Western institutions (p. 231).
1 Edward N. Luttwak, The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy,Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2012, 320 pp.Top of page
Frédéric Puppatti, « François Godement, Que veut la Chine ? De Mao au capitalisme (What does China want? From Mao to capitalism) », China Perspectives [Online], 2013/2 | 2013, Online since 01 June 2013, connection on 26 April 2017. URL : http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/6208Top of page
© All rights reservedTop of page