Skip to navigation – Site map
Special feature

Managing Migrant Contestation

Land appropriation, intermediate agency, and regulated space in Shenzhen
Edmund W. Cheng
p. 27-35

Abstract

This study considers the conditions under which China’s massive internal migration and urbanisation have resulted in relatively governed, less contentious, and yet fragile migrant enclaves. Shenzhen, the hub for rural-urban migration and a pioneer of market reform, is chosen to illustrate the dynamics of spatial contestation in China’s sunbelt. This paper first correlates the socialist land appropriation mechanisms to the making of the factory dormitory and urban village as dominant forms of migrant accommodation. It then explains how and why overt contention has been managed by certain intermediate agencies in the urban villages that have not only provided public goods but also regulated social order. It ends with an evaluation of the fragility of urban villages, which tend to facilitate urban redevelopment at the expense of migrants’ living space. The interplay between socialist institutions and market forces has thus ensured that migrant enclaves are regulated and integrated into the formal city.

Top of page

References

Bibliographical reference

Edmund W. Cheng, « Managing Migrant Contestation », China Perspectives, 2014/2 | 2014, 27-35.

Electronic reference

Edmund W. Cheng, « Managing Migrant Contestation », China Perspectives [Online], 2014/2 | 2014, Online since 01 January 2017, connection on 18 August 2017. URL : http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/6432

Top of page

About the author

Edmund W. Cheng

Edmund W. Cheng is a PhD candidate at the London School of Economics and a lecturer in political science at the Open University of Hong Kong.School of Arts and Social Sciences, Open University of Hong Kong, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong (ewcheng@ouhk.edu.hk).

By this author

Top of page

Copyright

© All rights reserved

Top of page
  • Logo CEFC – Centre d’études français sur la Chine contemporaine
  • Revues.org